ਵਿਵਾਦ ਨਿਪਟਾਰਾ ਕੇਸ

ਵਿਵਾਦ ਨਿਪਟਾਰਾ ਕੇਸ

ਕੇਸ ਹਵਾਲਾ ਨੰਬਰ :
ਕੇਸ ਹਵਾਲਾ ਨੰਬਰ: R3541
1.  ਕੇਸ ਹਵਾਲਾ ਨੰਬਰ R3541
1.  ਉੱਪ ਮੰਡਲ ਦਫਤਰ CITY EAST LUDHIANA/DS CITY CEN. (SPL) DIVN./TECH UNIT-I DARESI
2.  ਖਪਤਕਾਰ CS01/0010 of Sh/ Ms Mandeep Singh
3.  ਕੇਸ ਦਾਖਲ ਕਰਨ ਦੀ ਮਿਤੀ 2014-09-26
4.  ਵਰਨਣ Meter slow by 36.7%
5.  ਫੈਸਲਾ Brief History This is a CS connection having sanctioned load of 54.77KW. This connection was checked by ASE/Enf.-3, Ludhiana vide ECR no. 26/3322 dt. 05.08.2014 and reported “the meter was found slow by (-)95.63% when its accuracy was checked with LT ERS meter on pulse counting and it was found slow by (-)36.7% when its accuracy was checked on dial test.” When the MCB/CTC seals were opened , it was found that the potential of red phase is connected with yellow and vice versa. MCB and CTC seals appears tempered. DDL has been taken.The meter was taken to ME Lab wide vide store challan no. Spl.1 dt. 07.08.2014. and reported to overhaul the a/c according to ECR. But, during checking of meter at ME Lab, MCB and CTC seals were found OK. The accuracy of the meter alone was found within limits. When the meter was opened and checked, it was found that some portion of PCB is burnt. On the basis of ECR and ME report, the consumer was charged for meter running slow by (-)36.07% since the installation of meter. Proceedings Sh.Amarjeet Singh, brother of consumer and Sh. Jaswamt Singh, counsel of consumer appeared before the committee. In meeting dt. 17.10.2014, the committee directed P.O. to get petition from the consumer and submit parawise comments along with all relevant record relating to case in original in the next meeting. In meeting dt. 20.11.2014, P.O. presented the relevant documents before the committee. The consumer presented his detailed petition before the committee which was given to P.O. The committee directed P.O. to submit parawise comments, copy of DDL and detailed comments of Enf. On DDL in the next meeting. In meeting dt. 04.12.2014, P.O. submitted comments on the petition of the consumer. A copy of the comments was handed over to the consumer for study and rejoinder, if any. The consumer requested the committee to get his meter again checked from ME Lab. Considering the request of the consumer, the committee directed P.O. to get the disputed meter checked from ME Lab from the same situation as was found slow at the time of checking by ASE/Enf.-3 on dt.05.08.2014. In meeting dt. 19.12.2014, P.O. presented the copy of DDL and ME report required by the committee in the last meeting. The committee studied the presented documents but was not satisfied with the ME report. So, the committee directed P.O. to get the meter again checked from ME Lab in the same situation 6/7 in which it was checked by ASE/Enf.-3, Ludhiana on dt. 05.08.2014 and reported vide ECR no. 26/3322. P.O. was also directed to submit the reply on rejoinder submitted by the petitioner and detailed comments/speaking order from ASE/Enf.-3, Ludhiana on complete DDL to be submitted in the next meeting. In meeting dt. 28.01.2015, P.O. submitted the above said documents and the same were discussed with the counsel of the consumer. During discussion, the counsel of the consumer sought some clarification on the reverse KWH units (116978.99 units) mentioned in the joint report of ASE/Enf.-3, Ludhiana and ASE/ME, Ludhiana vide memo no. 795 dt.30.12.2014 on DDL. Then, the committee directed P.O. to get the desired clarification from the concerned metering firm (M/S L & T Ltd.) regarding the meaning/purpose of reverse KWH units recorded and also whether these reverse KWH units recorded have been added in the actual recorded consumption or not? which is to be submitted in the next meeting. In meeting dt. 13.02.2015, P.O. didn’t submit the above clarification as desired by the committee in the previous meeting to which the committee further directed P.O. to present the above clarification in the next meeting. The committee studied the DDLs taken on dt. 17.10.2014 and dt. 11.12.2014. While studying, the committee observed that there is difference between reverse KWH/KVAH units in both the DDLs. The committee directed P.O. to get clarification/comments of ASE/Enf.-3, Ludhiana on difference of reverse KWH/KVAH units in both the DDLs. In meeting dt. 05.03.2015, P.O. submitted the above said report of ASE/Enf.-3, Ludhiana as well as the required clarification from M/S L & T Ltd. to the committee. After studying both the reports, the committee directed P.O. to further get clarification from the Enforcement Agency (keeping in view the report of M/S L & T Ltd.) regarding whether the %age of slowness of meter (-36.7%) reported vide ECR no. 26/3322 dt. 05.08.2014 is chargeable to the consumer or not. In today’s meeting, P.O. presented the above clarification given by ASE/Enf.-3, Ludhiana vide memo no. 157 dt. 12.03.2015 in which he clarified that “ielYktRoink mItrW iv~c ieh pRovIjn hY ik jykr sI tI dy kunYkSn aulty hn qW AnrjI AkwaUNitMg forward direction iv~c hI hovygI Aqy Aijhy kysW iv~c sweIt qy fwiel tYst krn qy mItr dI AYkurysI sImw iv~c AwauNdI hY pr ivSw cricq Kpqkwr dI cYikMg Anuswr mOky qy XYlo Pyj dw potYSIAl rYf Pyj nwl joiVAw hoieAw sI Aqy rYf Pyj dw potYSIAl XYlo Pyj nwl joiVAw hoieAw sI[ potYSIAl dIAW qwrW sI tI sI iv~coN ieMtrcyNj kIqIAW hoeIAW sn[ mItr dI AYkurysI fwiel tYst qy cYk kIqI qW mItr 36.7% sloA cldw pwieAw igAw[ ies qoN spSt ho jWdw hY ik pI tI ieMtrcyNj dw kys hY Aqy pI tI ieMtrcyNj hox kwrn fwiel tYst iv~c mItr sloA AwieAw hY[ ie~Qy ieh spSt kIqw jWdw hY ik potYSIAl ieMtrcyNj krn nwl mItr sloA ho jWdw hY Aqy fwiel tYst krn qy mItr sloA pwieAw jWdw hY[ ies leI Kpqkwr dw Kwqw soDxw bxdw hY[” Decision In the light of above report of ASE/Enf.-3, Ludhiana, the committee found that it is a case of interchange of potential wires of Yellow Phase CT with the Red Phase. The committee deliberated the whole case and unanimously decided that the amount charged to the consumer for meter running slow by (-)36.7% from the installation of the meter to the date of removal of the meter is chargeable.
6.  ਫੈਸਲੇ ਦੀ ਮਿਤੀ 2015-03-27
ਸੁਣਵਾਈ/ ਪੇਸ਼ੀਆਂ
Page 1/1
 
Sr Noਸੁਣਵਾਈ ਦੀ ਮਿਤੀਵਰਨਣ
1 Fri 17, Oct 2014  Sh.Amarjeet Singh, brother of consumer and Sh. Jaswamt Singh, counsel of consumer appeared before the committee. The committee directed P.O. to get petition from the consumer and submit parawise comments of ASE/Op., City Centre Divn., Ludhiana along with all relevant record relating to case in original in the next meeting. The case has been deferred.
2 Fri 13, Feb 2015  Sh.Amarjeet Singh, brother of consumer and Sh. Jaswamt Singh, counsel of consumer appeared before the committee. In meeting dt. 17.10.2014, the committee directed P.O. to get petition from the consumer and submit parawise comments along with all relevant record relating to case in original in the next meeting. In meeting dt. 20.11.2014, P.O. presented the relevant documents before the committee. The consumer presented his detailed petition before the committee which was given to P.O. The committee directed P.O. to submit parawise comments, copy of DDL and detailed comments of Enf. On DDL in the next meeting. In meeting dt. 04.12.2014, P.O. submitted comments on the petition of the consumer. A copy of the comments was handed over to the consumer for study and rejoinder, if any. The consumer requested the committee to get his meter again checked from ME Lab. Considering the request of the consumer, the committee directed P.O. to get the disputed meter checked from ME Lab from the same situation as was found slow at the time of checking by ASE/Enf.-3 on dt.05.08.2014.



In meeting dt. 19.12.2014, P.O. presented the copy of DDL and ME report required by the committee in the last meeting. The committee studied the presented documents but was not satisfied with the ME report. So, the committee directed P.O. to get the meter again checked from ME Lab in the same situation in which it was checked by ASE/Enf.-3, Ludhiana on dt. 05.08.2014 and reported vide ECR no. 26/3322. P.O. was also directed to submit the reply on rejoinder submitted by the petitioner and detailed comments/speaking order from ASE/Enf.-3, Ludhiana on complete DDL to be submitted in the next meeting. In meeting dt. 28.01.2015, P.O. submitted the above said documents and the same were discussed with the counsel of the consumer. During discussion, the counsel of the consumer sought some clarification on the reverse KWH units (116978.99 units) mentioned in the joint report of ASE/Enf.-3, Ludhiana and ASE/ME, Ludhiana vide memo no. 795 dt.30.12.2014 on DDL. Then, the committee directed P.O. to get the desired clarification from the concerned metering firm (M/S L & T Ltd.) regarding the meaning/purpose of reverse KWH units recorded and also whether these reverse KWH units recorded have been added in the actual recorded consumption or not? which is to be submitted in the next meeting. In today’s meeting, P.O. didn’t submit the above clarification from M/S L & T Ltd. as desired by the committee in the previous meeting to which the committee further directed P.O. to present the above clarification in the next meeting. The committee studied the DDLs taken on dt. 17.10.2014 and dt. 11.12.2014. While studying, the committee observed that there is difference between reverse KWH/KVAH units in both the DDLs. The committee directed P.O. to get clarification/comments of ASE/Enf.-3, Ludhiana on difference of reverse KWH/KVAH units in both the DDLs. The case has been deferred for want of above two clarifications.

ਜਰੂਰੀ ਸੂਚਨਾ: ਇਹ ਸੁਵਿਧਾ ਸਿਰਫ ਤੁਹਾਡੀ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਹਿੱਤ ਹੈ, ਉਪਰੋਕਤ ਆਰਟੀਕਲ ਨੂੰ ਕਾਨੂੰਨੀ ਸਲਾਹ ਨਾ ਮੰਨਿਆ ਜਾਵੇ, ਸਹੀ ਅਤੇ ਪੂਰੀ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਲੈਣ ਵਾਸਤੇ ਸਬੰਧਤ ਦਫਤਰ ਨਾਲ ਸੰਪਰਕ ਕਰੋ ਜੀ|