ਵਿਵਾਦ ਨਿਪਟਾਰਾ ਕੇਸ

ਵਿਵਾਦ ਨਿਪਟਾਰਾ ਕੇਸ

ਕੇਸ ਹਵਾਲਾ ਨੰਬਰ :
ਕੇਸ ਹਵਾਲਾ ਨੰਬਰ: E3694
1.  ਕੇਸ ਹਵਾਲਾ ਨੰਬਰ E3694
1.  ਉੱਪ ਮੰਡਲ ਦਫਤਰ BATHINDA/DS DIVN. MAUR/DS S/D RAMA MANDI
2.  ਖਪਤਕਾਰ b62ra010017 of Sh/ Ms mittal refinery
3.  ਕੇਸ ਦਾਖਲ ਕਰਨ ਦੀ ਮਿਤੀ 2014-10-13
4.  ਵਰਨਣ The Electricity bill of M/S Mittal energy Ltd. Having Z/C No.B62-RA01-00017 was of Rs 2,54,44,480/- the consumer deposited Rs 2,54,44,470/- wide Cheque No 764823 dated 22-06-2012 Thus amount paid is actually Rs 10/- Less than actual amount payable. Accordingly surcharge was charged to the consumer in his next bill amounting Rs 23,28,318/- Consumer paid his bill through DD on 20-5-14 but due to some mistake accrued in the bank transaction DD not in cashed later on bank paid the amount through R.T.G.S. on dated 21-5-2014 but last date of bill payment was 20-5-2014. Accordingly surcharge Rs 48,08,886/- was imposed to the consumer.
5.  ਫੈਸਲਾ After hearing the consumer & presenting officer the ZDSC decided that as per E.S.I.M clause 76 the amount deposited by the consumer first adjusted against SOP and then E.D. So as per E.S.I.M instructions the consumer pay the full amount of the department in time. So the amount of surcharge of Rs23,28,318/- is not logically chargeable from the consumer for depositing Rs 10 less than the Bill amount. So only Rs 10 is Recoverable from consumer
6.  ਫੈਸਲੇ ਦੀ ਮਿਤੀ 2014-12-05
ਸੁਣਵਾਈ/ ਪੇਸ਼ੀਆਂ
Page 1/1
 
Sr Noਸੁਣਵਾਈ ਦੀ ਮਿਤੀਵਰਨਣ
1 Fri 21, Nov 2014  A) The consumer intimated to the ZDSC Committee on dated 21-11-2014 that the amount of bill issued to them was 2,54,44,470/- but the net amount payable were 2,54,44,480/- was not correct. After hearing the consumer & Presenting officer the ZDSC decide to obtain difference in two amount in written from Xen C.B.C Bathinda and defer the case for next hearing.
B) In this case the consumer pointed out that the bill paid by them through D.D on dated 20-05-2014 was return Back by the bank with remarks wrongly delivered and not drawn on us by mistake. Later on the amount was transferred by bank through R.T.G.S in the A/C of Powercom on dated 21-05-2014 Which is after the due date of the bill i.e 20-05-2014. As the Power Com. had not suffered any loss so the amount of surcharge is not payable. After hearing the consumer & Presenting officer the ZDSC decided that as per E.S.I.M clause 94 the competency to wave of surcharge amount lies with Dir. Sales and Dir. Comm. So the case sent to be competent authority.

ਜਰੂਰੀ ਸੂਚਨਾ: ਇਹ ਸੁਵਿਧਾ ਸਿਰਫ ਤੁਹਾਡੀ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਹਿੱਤ ਹੈ, ਉਪਰੋਕਤ ਆਰਟੀਕਲ ਨੂੰ ਕਾਨੂੰਨੀ ਸਲਾਹ ਨਾ ਮੰਨਿਆ ਜਾਵੇ, ਸਹੀ ਅਤੇ ਪੂਰੀ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਲੈਣ ਵਾਸਤੇ ਸਬੰਧਤ ਦਫਤਰ ਨਾਲ ਸੰਪਰਕ ਕਰੋ ਜੀ|