ਵਿਵਾਦ ਨਿਪਟਾਰਾ ਕੇਸ

ਵਿਵਾਦ ਨਿਪਟਾਰਾ ਕੇਸ

ਕੇਸ ਹਵਾਲਾ ਨੰਬਰ :
ਕੇਸ ਹਵਾਲਾ ਨੰਬਰ: A52
1.  ਕੇਸ ਹਵਾਲਾ ਨੰਬਰ A52
1.  ਉੱਪ ਮੰਡਲ ਦਫਤਰ HOSHIARPUR/DS DIVN. MAHILPUR/DS S/D MAHILPUR
2.  ਖਪਤਕਾਰ MS-92 of Sh/ Ms Sh. Amar Singh
3.  ਕੇਸ ਦਾਖਲ ਕਰਨ ਦੀ ਮਿਤੀ 2011-01-12
4.  ਵਰਨਣ CT/PT unit different
5.  ਫੈਸਲਾ The deferred case came up for hearing before the committee again on 23-09-2011. Mr. G.I.S. Grewal was present on the behalf of the consumer. Er. Jagmohan Singh, Dy. CE/DS Circle Hoshiarpur presented the case before the committee for discussion. The case was deliberated at length. The representative of the consumer told in the meeting that CT/PT is part of the meter, if CT/PT is defective then the meter is defective and Regulation 21.4(G) of Supply Code is applicable. CT/PT is the part of metering equipment but not the part of meter, so Regulation 21.4(G) of Supply Code is not applicable in this case. Sh. Grewal also insisted the committee in bringing on record his detailed representations regarding this case. Since Sh. Grewal is a retired employee of the PSPCL (eartwhile PSEB), is concerned with the equipments. The committee thought it proper to get expert opinion in this behalf. Accordingly, Er. O.S. Khamba, Addl. SE/Enforcement, PSPCL, Hoshiarpur was summoned to be present today and he attended the ZDSC. During the deliberations before the committee, Er. Khamba held detailed discussions with Sh. Grewal to bring home the true facts regarding the metering equipment and its working. Sh. Grewal could not specifically single out his case to convince the committee that the meter is defective. Even after detailed discussions, he was adamant to say that the meter was defective. When the committee questioned him about the report of the Enforcement Wing that the meter is O.K. and especially so when the same meter continuously put to use at the premises of the consumer till date, then how could he justify that the meter was not O.K. Sh. Grewal had no reply to satisfy the committee that the PT is not the part of the metering equipment and resultant is the meter. He agrees that the PT is defective so meter is also defective. His plea is all together unjustified and is not based on any cogent reasons much less any instructions of the PSPCL in this behalf. The meter in this case was checked on 29-10-2010 and it continues to be in position till date. The DDL in this case was carefully and minutely perused. When the DDL shows that the mistake of defective occurred on 29-05-2008 i.e. PT was defective/failure. The DDL is a speaking picture and as such there is nothing on record to contradict it. Sh. Grewal invited the attention of the committee to 21.4(G) of Supply Code 2007. The contention is not available to him and it relates only to defective meters. In this case, in hand, the meter is running O.K. till date. As such, his plea does not stand. Attention of the committee was invited to regulation 23 of Condition of Supply 2008 relevant and applicable to the period of this case, which is given as under :- CTs ND PTs OF METERING EQUIPMENT “Where the accuracy of meter is not involved and it is a case of incorrect connections or defective CTs PTs, genuine calculation mistakes etc., charges will be adjusted in favour of Board/consumer, as the case may be, for the period, the mistake/defect continued. Additional charges will be recovered by serving a supplementary bill-cum-show cause notice. The consumer may also be allowed to pay the amount in installments.” Sh. Grewal could not bring forth anything in this case. The committee thus comes to the conclusion that PT is part of the metering equipment and not meter itself. After due deliberations, the committee holds that in this case the PT, a part of the metering equipment was defective and resultant losses to the PSPCL is result of the defective PT which the consumer is bound to bear. Sh. Grewal could not bring forth anything on record and unfortunately concluded that he has not given proper hearing. Accordingly, this case is disposed of against the consumer that no merits in his submissions. The consumer may accordingly be charged as per the amount charged w.e.f. 29-05-08 (from the date of occurrence of the fault) till the date of replacement of CT/PT units in this case. Interest/surcharge may be recovered from the consumer as per instructions of PSPCL.
6.  ਫੈਸਲੇ ਦੀ ਮਿਤੀ 2011-09-23
ਸੁਣਵਾਈ/ ਪੇਸ਼ੀਆਂ
Page 1/1
 
Sr Noਸੁਣਵਾਈ ਦੀ ਮਿਤੀਵਰਨਣ

ਜਰੂਰੀ ਸੂਚਨਾ: ਇਹ ਸੁਵਿਧਾ ਸਿਰਫ ਤੁਹਾਡੀ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਹਿੱਤ ਹੈ, ਉਪਰੋਕਤ ਆਰਟੀਕਲ ਨੂੰ ਕਾਨੂੰਨੀ ਸਲਾਹ ਨਾ ਮੰਨਿਆ ਜਾਵੇ, ਸਹੀ ਅਤੇ ਪੂਰੀ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਲੈਣ ਵਾਸਤੇ ਸਬੰਧਤ ਦਫਤਰ ਨਾਲ ਸੰਪਰਕ ਕਰੋ ਜੀ|